Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Filhos de um deus maior. O deus melhor. O deus que eu gostaria de sodomizar enquanto (ele) bebé.

Diz-me, leitor atento, confessa-me: julgas-te um dos mais horríveis seres humanos?
A sério? (Em que boa conta vos tenho...)
How dare you? Lê bem o que aqui cito (subtraí da World Ugly Web).





Iranian rape victim being stoned to death for luring innocent men to sex.
(Picture missing.)
In Iran, stoning a woman to death is not a crime; using a stone that is not of the prescribed size is.

Les pierres utilisées pour infliger la mort par lapidation ne devront pas être grosses au point que le condamné meure après en avoir reçu une ou deux. Elles ne devront pas non plus être si petites qu'on ne puisse leur donner le nom de pierre. La taille moyenne est choisie généralement afin de faire expier la faute par la souffrance.
Les lapideurs doivent rester à distance d’une quinzaine de mètres de leur cible et choisir avec soin leurs pierres : Les pierres coupantes sont choisies pour leurs arrêtes effilées qui provoquent les saignements les plus spectaculaires. Une pierre coupante doit de préférence être lancée au visage du condamné. Les pierres rondes nécessitent moins de précision car elles sont efficaces partout. Elles sont idéales pour briser les os et provoquer les hémorragies internes fatales.

In Islam, it is acceptable for grown men to have sex with young boys and girls. However, if two grown men consent to have sex with each other, it is considered a crime punishable by death.
Until the victim (child “wife”) turns 9 her paedophile “husband” has a “sacred” right to practise what is obnoxiously termed in the Shariah as “thighing” (mufakhadzhah مفاخذة). Respected Iranian mullah the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini eruditely defines this “holy” tradition as follows in his book Tahrirolvasyleh (volume 4, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990):

Thighing is a means for an adult male to enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.

A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate vaginally, but sodomising the child is acceptable. If a man does penetrate and damage the child then, he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life.





Bem sei, são pequenas diferenças culturais. Pequenas.

Talvez o problema não seja do deus, desse deus condescendente com tão pueris enrabanços e assim justo nos apedrejamentos. Se é que há mesmo um problema, haverá homem ou grupo deles com largueza de escroto suficiente para arcar com as responsabilidades que se inventaram para esse deus?, haverá coragem para admitir: "Isso não é nada conversa de deus, é conversa minha, é invenção minha"? Há ou não valentia para se retirar o que se pôs na boca do deus?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home